Defense Verdict- Unecessary & Unsterile Foot Surgery (KY)

A  62 year old women  underwent a surgery  by her podiatrist on her ankle in 2004 to remove a cyst. It was performed by a podiatrist. Several weeks later at a post op visit, the defendant had removed the sutures. Plaintiff recalled that the defendant droped the instrument used to remove the sutures on the floor and then continued to use it without cleaning. At a following visit, there were signs of  infection. Shortly thereafter plaintiff was admitted to a hospital with a diagnosis of infection. Plaintiff  underwent a surgery for a skin graft.


Plaintiff alleged that  the surgery was not needed and that the defendant operated in a surgical enviornment and there was  a delay by the defendant in sending her to the hospital.
The podiatrist-defendant contended that the surgery was proper. He also argued that while there was an infection complication,  he responded to it properly and it was managed.


A defense verdict was entered and there was no recovery by the plaintiff.


Experts: David Widom, DPM,  Alan Catanzariti, DPM, Pittsburgh, PA
 

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.podiatrymalpracticeblog.com/admin/trackback/113504
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.